Audio of Gwen Jordan, Innocence Project

The Illinois Innocence Project is part of a nationwide network of attorneys who work to exonerate convicted felons who have been wrongly accused and incarcerated. Two attorneys from the Innocence Project will speak tonight at the McLean County League of Women Voters annual dinner, along with a former prisoner who is still working to have his murder conviction expunged. WGLT's Judy Valente has this report. - See more at:


Appeal to Aphrodite Jonees TV Show on Crime

Dear Aphrodite Jones and Producers of the Aphrodite Jones Television Show,

Recently I saw the program on Tyrone Hood (Menard Prison IL) who served twenty years behind bars for a crime he did not commit, based on the flimsiest of circumstantial evidence. I was struck by the similarity of another inmate at Menard, my nephew Barton McNeil, who is serving life without parole (now at sixteen years) for purportedly killing his three year old daughter, Christina McNeil. The Illinois Innocent Project is now working on his behalf, based on hasty and erroneous judgments by investigators, lost crime scene videos, assumptions, and failing to look for another perpetrator responsible for the crime. They are now firmly convinced of his innocence.
Bart’s case is unique in that he always maintained that his ex-girlfriend Misook Kim (Nowlin) (Wang) killed his child one night, after a violent break up, by entering a bedroom window and asphyxiating his daughter. DNA left behind (blood, two different urine stains, hair) was never tested, nor was a finger print lifted from the broken screen window, or a key piece of new evidence--- investigating the web re-building habits of a spider. At the DNA hearing, Arachnid experts from the Smithsonian Institute, testified that spiders do rebuild cobwebs after twenty minutes of destruction, and unknowledgable police investigators decided the next day that the presence of a spider-web could only mean no one entered through the window.
It was never proven that Bart was a sex offender, collected pornography, or treated his child inappropriately. Yet perverted conduct was, none-the-less, heavily suggested by the prosecutors. Nor did computer forensics find damming evidence of sexual interest of young children. Bart was convicted by a bench trial (no jury) advised by his incompetent lawyers who did nothing to contest a ‘Limine’ judgement excluding an alternative killer theory. Without a second person theory, Bart was hopelessly undefended. The legal system was adamant in their conviction that no one else could have entered his room.
The pivotal point in the case occurred in 2011, after sixteen years in prison with no further appeals, a huge break in his case opened. His Korean ex-girlfriend, Misook Kim, murdered again, avenging her husband, Don Wang, who wanted a divorce. In a premeditative manner, similar to the first murder, she asphyxiated. Linda Tyda Wang, in Crest Hill IL, for the same avenging motives. Misook Wang is now in prison, but refuses to admit other crimes.
Misook failed the polygraph, and her alibi in the 1998 homicide (McNeil) for that evening relied heavily on two testimonies: (1) Her new boyfriend at the time, Don Wang, whom she later married, and (2) Her brother Dongson Wang, visiting in Korea at the time. Records showed that he lived in more than four U.S. residences with Misook. The two second call to Korea was based on suggested time of death (around midnight), yet toxicologists now say that the stomach contents could be off by several hours.

The full story on Barton McNeil can be read on FreeBart.Org which includes audio tapes, investigative reports, interviews, newspaper articles, and timelines. I hope you will consider this story for your program.

Jeanne Ross



Bart needs modest financial help for snacks, underclothing and socks, toothpaste, brushes, combs, tennis shoes, etc. Prisoners receive no income other than what friends and relatives can send.
Use J-Pay and search for Barton McNeil, Menard Correctional Center IL, his prison numnber. #K75924
Then follow guidelines for setting up a payment.


Letter exerpt from Bart in prison dated Dec 17 2014

Exerpts from Bart McNeil's letter dated 17 Dec 2014

“Upon my return to this prison (Menard) from my initial court hearing in April, I’ve been in the same cell house and in the same cell with the same cellmate for eight months. But that’s a good thing. While I’d been in this same cell house for a few years some time ago, I’m pleased to be back here again after recently having been housed in some less-then-desirable cell houses. With a little older inmate population, this cell house is a little more peaceful and less noisy than the other 4 cell houses at this maximum security prison. Thus we are a little less subject to lock downs and other punitive measures. By far this is the best of the cell houses and I was lucky to end up back here again.”


McNeil Family Celebrates Small Victory With DNA Approval

BLOOMINGTON - A team, working to free a Bloomington man serving a long prison sentence for the alleged murder of his daughter is celebrating a small victory.

Earlier this month, the Illinois Innocence Project held a hearing in McLean County to bring new evidence into play for Barton McNeil. At the hearing, they asked for fingerprints found on the window screen, as well as the bed sheets and pillow cases to be tested for DNA evidence.

As we first told you Tuesday, the team learned that all except for a night shirt and underwear of McNeil’s daughter, Christina will be tested. The family agrees, it gives McNeil’s case for a new trial more legs.

"We think that any evidence that might have been found, DNA touch evidence, skin cells that were left on the night shirt or the underwear might have been extremely important and valuable,” said McNeil’s cousin Christopher Ross.

The defense team says new evidence against McNeil’s former girlfriend should be considered with the DNA evidence. The DNA testing should take about six to nine months to complete.



Convicted child killer maintains innocence, says new evidence could prove ex-girlfriend guilty

By WEEK Reporter
July 31, 2014 Updated Aug 1, 2014 at 10:49 AM CDT

MENARD, Ill. --June of 1999 Bloomington man Barton McNeil was convicted of killing his 3-year-old daughter Christina McNeil.

For years McNeil firmly believed his ex-girlfriend Misook Nowlin committed the crime, but his claim fell on deaf ears. It turns out, years later in 2012, his ex-girlfriend was convicted of killing her husband's mother.

News Now Digital Daily - subscribe to our daily newsletter

Click here to sign up for local offers.

With a turn of events and additional DNA testing, McNeil's defense says it could prove his innocence.


June 16 1998, Barton McNeil's life had changed forever. It was that day he found his 3-year-old daughter dead.

The original 911 transcripts reads:
911 operator: 911. What's your emergency?
McNeil: I need an ambulance! I need it fast! ...My daughter's dying I think!

The death of Christina would eventually condemn him at the Menard Correctional Center, a maximum security adult male prison. His conviction: two counts of first degree murder and 100 years in prison.

"If this is my fate, God forbid I live this long," said McNeil. "I'm sentenced to death by prison."

All for a crime he says he did not commit. It is a murder mystery that begins in Bloomington-Normal, after a break up argument with his former girlfriend, Misook Nowlin.

"She was stalking me at every turn. She would demand I spent time with her. She threatened to kill herself," said McNeil. "She had this maniacal jealousy of Christina, the primary object of my affection."

The morning after the breakup, McNeil was horrified by what he saw.

"I woke to find my daughter dead in her bedroom," explained McNeil.

She was suffocated -- bruises around her body.

The original Bloomington Police crime scene footage shows the window screen had been cut above the latches.

"I'm absolutely convinced of this... that her killer was already in the room for the purpose of killing my daughter," said McNeil.

However, the court said the evidence did not qualify as proof. Cobwebs and dust showed an undisturbed area. The decision reads, "There is no evidence that someone else entered the home at any time." McNeil's cousin, Chris Ross, has been studying the case for years.

"The prosecution was able to put in place this Motion in Limine that made it impossible for Bart to utter Misook's name in his defense," said Ross.

Any evidence regarding Misook had to be thrown out. The successful Motion in Limine disallowed McNeil a defense that another person committed the crime. Legal authorities say McNeil was, therefore, the only one who could have been in the apartment and was guilty by default. McNeil was losing hope.

"I'm staying here probably until I die," said McNeil.

Then, a turning point. In 2012, Misook Nowlin was convicted of killing her mother-in-law. Nowlin's husband had been wanting a divorce.

"It was an intricately planned crime," said Ross.

She lured her husband's mother, Wenlan Tyda, to a location where she strangled her to death.

"Had this murder not come to the attention of the public, Bart would be sitting in prison without hope and awaiting his eventual death," said Ross.

As of now, he is and will be. But Nowlin's conviction in the Tyda case also caught the attention of the University of Illinois Springfield's Innocence Project.

"They're extremely selective, they maybe take one in every hundred letters they receive," said Ross.

Two lawyers and a team of law students are fighting for McNeil's freedom. They have already petitioned for the approval of DNA testing of new evidence--blood stains, fingerprints and more. It is evidence lawyers believe could clear McNeil's name.

"Justice will only be served if my daughter's killers will be prosecuted for what they did," said McNeil.

Friday McNeil will have a hearing at the Mclean County Courthouse that will determine what evidence will be tested further.


Rally Urges Testing in Old Cases – Pantograph

Rally urges DNA testing in old cases

DAVID PROEBER, The Pantagraph

Several people rally outside the McLean County Law and Justice on Friday, calling for DNA testing for Jamie Snow and other people believed to be innocent.

11 hours ago  •  Edith Brady-Lunny

BLOOMINGTON — Advocates for defendants who have challenged their convictions rallied in front of the McLean County Law and Justice Center Friday, asking the state's attorney to move forward with DNA testing in two cases.

Supporters of Jamie Snow, convicted in 2001 of killing gas station attendant Billy Little, urged prosecutor Jason Chambers to approve ballistics testing on evidence. Tammy Alexander, organizer of a group to exonerate Snow, also argued that several witnesses proved unreliable.

Organizing the rally with Alexander was Andrew Dubois, a Bloomington man who served a dozen years in prison for a sexual assault he maintains he did not commit. He is working to clear his name.

"There's not one shred of evidence to back up the victim's account" of an assault," Alexander said of Dubois' case.

About 25 people attended the event, which included Chicago lawyer Alan Mills, who has handled high-profile class action lawsuits on prison issues. Also attending was James Kluppelberg, exonerated of arson after serving 25 years.

Mills urged DNA testing in the Snow and Barton McNeil cases. McNeil was convicted in 1998 of killing his daughter. He has maintained his innocence and argued his former girlfriend Misook Nowlin, convicted of murder in an unrelated case last year, is a solid suspect.

"The state's attorney is the only one with control over who goes into prison. The time is right, the movement is coming, so let's do it," Mills said of the testing.

In a statement, Chambers said he agreed to test blood and urine in the McNeil case but is not convinced that testing - aimed to link Nowlin - is necessary.

Nowlin was McNeil's girlfriend "and of course her DNA is going to be in his apartment," said Chambers.

In order for forensic testing to be done, results must produce new evidence that is relevant to the case, he said.

Chambers, who has been in office about 18 months, previously said he inherited the decisions made in their cases. But Chambers also said he does not believe his three predecessors "would have let someone remain in prison if presented with evidence of actual innocence. I would not, either."



There was no place to make comments on this article.



State agrees to some DNA testing in 1998 murder case

February 26, 2014 4:45 pm  •  Edith Brady-Lunny

BLOOMINGTON — Lawyers for a Bloomington man convicted in 1999 of killing his daughter said Wednesday they will expand their request for DNA testing of evidence they believe will point to the child's real killer: a woman serving 55 years for killing her mother-in-law in 2012.

Barton McNeil is serving 100 years for the 1998 death of his 3-year-old daughter, Christina.

McNeil's lawyers with the University of Illinois-Springfield’s Downstate Innocence Project said they will file an amended petition soon seeking to add a window screen from the victim's bedroom to the list of items they believe should undergo forensic testing.

McNeil has maintained his innocence in the 1998 death, claiming his former girlfriend, Misook Nowlin, was responsible for smothering the girl. Nowlin was convicted in 2012 of strangling her mother-in-law, Wenlan Linda Tyda, during a September 2011 dispute in Bloomington.

Defense lawyer John Hanlon asked Judge Scott Drazewski for a quick turnaround on a hearing date to finalize the initial testing.

Noting that McNeil is represented by the Innocence Project -- a group that assists people with innocence claims -- Hanlon said "we would like to keep things moving for his sake."

Meanwhile, State's Attorney Jason Chambers said the state will agree to DNA testing on blood and urine stains found on the victim's bed sheet, but will oppose other testing that he is not convinced will produce new evidence. Chambers said he may be persuaded to support more testing depending upon what the first round of tests show.

Calling Nowlin "a convenient and unsympathetic person you can point to" as a possible suspect, Chambers said it's likely Nowlin's DNA could be detected at McNeil's home given their prior relationship. The prosecutor acknowledged, however, that if Nowlin's DNA is matched blood stains on the bed sheet "then we might be willing to test some of the other items."

For McNeil's lawyers, the similarities between the girl's manner of death in 1998 and Tyda's murder 13 years later should convince the state to approve the testing.

"We have a case where not only can we say our person is not guilty, we can say here's the person who did it," said Hanlon.

The cost of the DNA testing expected to be completed by Orchid Cellmark in Texas will be covered by the Innocence Project, said Hanlon.

A March 26 hearing is set to review the case.

Copyright 2014 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

12) Comments

  1. markv66
    Report Abuse
    markv66 - 3 hours ago
    After reading up on Mr. McNeil's situation, I believe Bart is an innocent man. The due process he received at the time of his trial appears to be inadaquate at best. If there is more evidence, let it be known.
  2. Col Henry Drummond
    Report Abuse
    Col Henry Drummond - 10 hours ago
    It would seem, in retrospect, that this case needs significant further investigation.Obviously, mistakes can be made in the legal process. The people running the system have a difficult job, and many citizens appreciate that they try their best to get it right.

    When mistakes are made, and innocent people are harmed, we as a society must move quickly to redress the wrongs.

    Can you imagine what Mr. McNeil has been through? His crazy ex-girlfriend murders his daughter, and instead of having time to mourn her death, he is presented with a mountain of an obstacle in having to defend his innocence.

    If this is true, and there seems to be significant evidence pointing in that direction...Wow....just wow. One can only begin to imagine what Mr. McNeil has been through.

    Should anyone involved in this process read this comment, as a taxpayer, might I ask that this matter be expedited and moved forward at minimal cost? It would seem that if this is true, it is going to cost us a goodly sum. If so, then we should move it along as quickly as reasonably possible, in order to minimize costs to the taxpayer, and redress the wrong.

    Let's get this moving!

    Thank you for your time.

  3. Felix Katzenbaum
    Report Abuse
    Felix Katzenbaum - 11 hours ago
    I just came across a website that tells Bart's whole story ( Wow. It's terrible how so many people are behind bars because their trial was rushed, investigations inconclusive, and twenty years of their productive lives cut off from education, business success, raising a family. I hope the DA allows the full DNA testing and that this young man can be exonerated for a crime he never committed.
  4. bob miller
    Report Abuse
    bob miller - 17 hours ago
    Good point plainjane777 and other posters to this blog. Misook Nowlin was the other lead suspect in the 1998 murder of Christina McNeil. She obviously had the motive. It was 3 year old Christina that Bart was devoting most of his free time with picking her up from daycare for example. He was more than 50% her care giver on account his ex-wife Tita with whom he separated three years prior worked several jobs while Bart had worked over a dozen years at the local Red Lobster restaurant for which employees still recall Bart and speak favorably of him to this day as he was a good, responsible and well liked employee. Misook with whom Bart had separated from two months prior to the murder by getting his own apartment (prior to this Misook and Barton lived together) was jealous of the time Bart devoted to his daughter. Unlike herself who only desired to visit with her own then eight year old daughter every other weekend. Bart also had to pay his former wife monthly child support. Something that also annoyed Misook as it took away several hundred dollars each month that in dating Bart, might otherwise have benefited from such as more dinners out or clothes. Misook had several felony clothing theft convictions so the record shows that she definitely liked expensive designer clothes. She also had plead guilty to a domestic assault charge perpetrated by her against none other than Bart and Christina a year prior to the murder occurring (ironically Misook's sentencing for that conviction was to occur the day Christina turned up dead... coincidence here too?) that warranted her taking the local AVERT anger management classes. Two months after Christina's murder she violently assaulted her then eight year old daughter and was convicted of this Felony crime as well and again had to attend yet more AVERT anger management counseling. And as a result of Christina, Bart had to be in almost daily and constant communication with his former wife Tita McNeil with whom Misook resented. It is simple to see by anyone knowledgeable about the circumstances of this case that Misook was jealous of Christina. As even with an age difference such as this, being jealous of even a frail, innocent three year old child, especially for a person like Misook who holds no regard for the sanctity of life having murdered a 70+ year old defenseless mother-in-law. Age is of no consequence for a person like Misook. A thirty year old woman jealous of the attention being poured upon a three year old by her father. Removing Christina by murdering enabled Misook to get even with two people: Bart and Tita. Jealousy was a stated motive by McLean County prosecutors as playing the most important reason Misook murdered Linda Tyda. It was more important than her collecting on a life insurance policy her and her husband were beneficiaries on. So there is definite modus operandi similarities between the two cases at work that cannot be denied. As a result of Misook being a suspect in 1998, she, not Bart, was administered by the State of Illinois a Polygraph exam for which she failed all four key questions concerning the murder. Polygraphs are not admissible in court but are still in use today, as it was back then, for investigation purposes. Misook was asked by the Illinois State Police Examiner "Did you suffocate Christina on June 18th"?; "Did you suffocate Christina?"; Did you enter Barton's apartment between midnight and 7 a.m.?" and "Were you at his apartment when Christina was suffocated"? The Examiner wrote in his final report "There were erratic and inconsistent responses on the subject's polygraph records which preclude the examiner from rendering an opinion for these questions". McLean County Prosecutors successfully argued before the Bench Trial Judge (Bart was not tried by a jury but instead what is known in legal parlance as a "Sole Fact Finder") on this unusual case a Motion in Limine that prevented Barton McNeil, or his assigned Public Defender attorney, from ever so mentioning or making reference to his former girlfriend Misook during his trial. "Beyond reasonable doubt" is the standard of evidence required to validate a criminal conviction in our U.S. based adversarial legal system. So the question now needs to be raised: Has credible doubt now been cast on this conviction that Misook, who had the motive and capable premeditative mind to plan a murderous crime (as evidenced in the Tyda murder trial) could have been in error? With Misook now convicted I know that I and many others now have reasonable doubt concerning the validity of the murder conviction of Bart McNeil. With or without potentially new DNA forensic evidence findings, doubt now exists if for nothing else, the fact that Misook whom Barton always said was the very likely true murderer of his child, did in fact murder a person under similar circumstances in 2011 for which she was convicted in 2013. This can't possibly be attributed as being just a mere coincidence. Either this wrongfully convicted man's statements over the last fifteen years regarding Misook should be accepted as true today or anything and everything that can be forensically tested, that hasn't been tested by the State prior, be tested. After all, in this request, nothing that will be tested is at County expense. What would be the point then of keeping any artifact from the crime untested in some storage facility somewhere? As I follow and understand this case, this will be Bart's second appeal and as a result, his last. I feel there should be no argument over what can be tested or not tested when the stakes are so high: namely a wrongful conviction with the remainder of a potentially innocent man's life involved. I and others encourage Jason Chamber do the right thing each and every step of the way that is to not stand in the way of the Innocence Project's desires in seeking out the full truth in this incredible case. Once testing has been complete either there will exist new forensic evidence from this process or not. Even without new forensic evidence I now have my reasonable doubt the State got the right person and let the guilty one roam free to kill again. I am sure Linda Tyda if she were alive would desire all items that could be tested be tested as well and to send Misook Nowlin on an even longer sentence and greater notoriety as a female serial killer that she deserves. Studies of female serial killers have shown the usual motivation behind the serial killings is jealousy. Imagine that.
    1. Whatafoolbelieves
      Report Abuse
      Whatafoolbelieves - 12 hours ago
      I am sorry, taxing read, no paragraphs. Juror fell asleep during testimony. Any assessment on what this will cost Mclean County Tax Payers?
      1. bob miller
        Report Abuse
        bob miller - 9 hours ago
        Apology accepted. No idea what it will cost. Should price be a consideration in any instance involving a wrongful conviction? There was no jury in this case. Maybe if there had been, there would have been a different conclusion. As it would have taken just one person to be unconvinced "beyond a reasonable doubt" existed. Versus one juror. The judge that handled this case. Further to add Misook had no Alibi during the time period the crime was committed. There was no physical evidence linking Bart to the crime. He was convicted on circumstantial evidence alone. When Jason was elected all of the wealth of investigative records that showed Misook making conflicting statements to police, the failed Polygraph exams, etc., he would not have known about. Perhaps one of his next tasks should be to confer with the BPD that want to stand behind "their man", the now retired Detective Shepherd, and following a more extensive review of the case, order a new investigation. That might be a good move on Mr. Chambers part. Good day.
  5. Maggie 1
    Report Abuse
    Maggie 1 - February 27, 2014 6:02 pm
    In reading the history behind the murder of Linda Tyda in this same city, and the history behind what Barton McNeil stated 15 years ago about the woman who was accused of murdering Mrs. Tyda, it is an honor to see that Mr. Chambers is willing to let some DNA testing done in the Barton McNeil case of 1998-1999. It is the greatness of the Illinois Innocence Project and others like them that stand for what is right and work diligently to do so that there are so many exonerations coming forth in the past ten years or so. I believe that any court would only do justice and want to do everything possible to make a wrong corrected. Stop the 'egg on your face' feelings about wrongful convictions--especially in circumstantial cases, give them every opportunity to prove otherwise with the new tools we have today. In this instance, why wait to see what happens on bed sheets alone? Why not test it all. The Illinois Innocence Project has been there before and knows what they need. Besides that, they state that they will bear the costs of these tests. Let's do it right and get justice for this man now.
  6. plainjane777
    Report Abuse
    plainjane777 - February 27, 2014 9:10 am
    If I recall correctly, the other item is a fingerprint from the window. Although Nowlin is an excellent suspect in this case, it is a narrow view by the SAO to exclude the possibility of another alternative suspect. To put it bluntly, Chambers is NOT testing the fingerprint because he saying that it doesn't matter if it was Nowlin's, because she was frequently at the home. However, what if the fingerprint is from a known pedophile that lived in the neighborhood? Or anyone else for that matter. The source of the fingerprint cannot be established unless it's tested. It should ALL be tested - why should he have to wait months until the SAO decides whether it should pursue further testing or not. What burden is this on McLean County if the Innocence Project is paying for it, and is willing to foot the bill for ALL of the items tested?
  7. whatwasthat
    Report Abuse
    whatwasthat - February 27, 2014 7:35 am
    I hope they follow this lead to put questions to rest. If another innocent man is spending time in prison for a crime he did not commit, someone needs to step up and get him released.
  8. exrepub
    Report Abuse
    exrepub - February 27, 2014 6:32 am
    I think when there is any question, they should automatically do DNA tests. Only common sense.
  9. willi
    Report Abuse
    willi - February 26, 2014 11:40 pm
    I distinctly remember Bart telling me over 15 years ago that his ex-girlfriend was the only person he knew that was crazy (and spiteful) enough to harm his daughter. Maybe the state and local law enforcement are hoping to avoid backlash from convicting the wrong person, rather than a convenient attempt to blame someone considered unsympathetic to a jury.
  10. otis1949
    Report Abuse
    otis1949 - February 26, 2014 9:51 pm
    What say you preacher Chuck?



1998 Barton McNeil Trial News Article